The hundred-year language

 

First of all, the document seems old, it says so below the title, it is from 2003, but I would say the design of the page is what gives away its age a first glance, not actually related that much, despite we talking about evolution and change in the article, but it is funny how the design of something can easily tell the age, especially talking about web pages since they change so much so quickly. 

The first idea of the main branch I am not so fond of, I do not know if it's possible to predict if you will be still near the main branch in a future state, things can change very quickly and drastically, and something that in a time seemed like a little deviation of the main branch, just implementing some changes that not affect the core, can end up becoming the main philosophy of the future main branch that will spawn a ton of other little branches. 

In addition to my previous point something like the efficiency of the language in computational resources declining in a lot of popular languages would seem like a contra intuitive thing in the 60’s, since nowadays the time it takes to develop something usually is more valuable than the resources said program would consume, obviously to an extent, and in recent days I would say it is changing again reverting to efficiency in a lot of applications, since the technological boom is not as shiny as once was and the speed in which we get more computational power is decreasing, elevating the value of this one characteristic, I don’t know how the hardware technology is going to advance in the future and trying to predict it long term I would say is pretty hard and an successful guess would be more luck that theory and analysis.

Comentarios

Publicar un comentario

Entradas más populares de este blog

Reflections on trusting trust

  The article is short, but it contains the answer to a question that was posed since the beginning of the semester, the chicken and egg problem that stems from the C compiler being written in C , I’ve already searched for an answer of this and it introduced me to the concept of Bootstrapping , it’s a funny and accurate name for the concept , basically being using another language to compile a subset of the language and ten using the compiled language to compile the rest in an iterative way until you have your complete compiler .   The anecdotes of the trojan horses reminds me the time I read exactly about this , where you have to give your trust to the compiler since it can be tampered with and you wouldn’t know about it, and sure it’s an old problem and various techniques have been implemented to try to solve the problem like diverse double compiling but at the end of the day it only works if you have an untampered compiler to begin with, it just checks if other compilers have
Leer más

The mother of Compilers

  We owe a lot of we have today to Hopper, she didn’t took into account usual conventions, that’s probably why she was so ahead of her time , not taking as a given your “role” as a woman in those time was difficult , really difficult , it was an all the way up against almost all the people in you life.   She even had to learn all about computers on the fly, although she had a mathematics background it is still difficult to learn that much specially of society is not on your side , but it seemed she found a home in the army, where her abilities were not underestimated and she was considered a valuable asset to the forces .   She was immersed deep in her work; I would say her work was her life and vice versa , even thinking wide and proposing that a computer should be easier to use , and she end up writing a compiler, breaking though most of the techniques that are still in use today, but making the first time was not easy at all, it should have taken an enormous amount of
Leer más

Internals of GCC

  First interesting thing that came to mind is the new trend of the processors to have more cores a ta c k le better more parallelizable tasks, so compilers must change to take better advantage of the advancements in technology, surely considering where the technology is going, while in past years the focus was to increase the instructions per cycle and the clock speed of the processor , the truth is that there are physical limits to the minimum size of a chip, and we are reaching them pretty fast with our x86 architecture .   The modularity of the components of gcc is also pretty impressive , it also makes sense, at one end the thing that changes is the language you are reading and interpreting, once you get to a universal structure the process of the gcc compiler should be the same and the front end and back end could be interchangeable while the middle end remains the same, so it reminds me a lot of the blocks we used to construct compilers and interpreters   It was very imp
Leer más